The lack of progress on the roofing has been frustrating. The felt was put on the garage on January 31. They put the felt on the sunroom roof on February 25. They started on the main house on March 9. When they started on the main house, Bret told me they would be finished in one week. They are still not finished. Over the past two months we have had some bad weather, but for the most part, the duration of this roofing job has been dictated by poor planning and just not showing up to work. Four times they ran out of materials (shingles three times and ridge vents once). They could have finished with a single day of effort this week, but, despite their promises, they did not show up. The only saving grace is that the remaining work is either cosmetic or inconsequential from the standpoint of protecting the underlying assets. We paid 1/3 down and will not pay any more until everything (including cleanup) is complete. They obviously do not have any cash flow concerns.
Yesterday morning, I called the fireplace dealer to talk with them about our notion of using a wall mounted fireplace vent instead of a vent through the roof. Bobby was not in the store, but I was told Chad would be able to help me. He was with a client and would call me back. There were three main questions we wanted them to comment on. First, was there any reason they would not recommend a wall mounted vent as opposed to the roof vent. Second, relative to any combustible surface, how far away did such a vent need to be (this distance is determined by the fireplace manufacturer). Third, were there other wall mounted vents that we might want to consider. We have only found one manufacturer on-line (DuraVent), but I did find a variant of the one I included in the posting of April 16. This one (their Sconce design) is smaller, 11" square versus 16" square for the other design.
I like the Sconce design more than the alternative below, but T has the responsibility for all aesthetic aspects of the project and she has not made a decision.
Chad did call back, but I was not able to take the call. The message he left said that they could mount the wall vent after the brick has been laid, or if we preferred, he could provide us with the size of hole to have the brick layers leave. As for the minimum distance between the vent and the closest combustible surface, he said the top of the vent had to be at least 18" from that surface. This is one-half the distance I was expecting. Also, I am not even sure the cement board eave material, under which the vent will be mounted, is even considered a combustible surface. The image below shows the two sizes of the vents situated 18" below the bottom edge of the east fascia. T and I have been trying to identify reasons not to go with this wall mounted vent approach. Unless we are informed of a technical problem we are currently unaware of, we will go this way. The only outstanding question then is if there are other wall mounted vent designs we might want to consider.
In the afternoon, I tried to call Chad back but was told he was out on a job but would call me back. He never did. I will call again on Monday.
As Mike was cleaning up around the garage on Friday, he took the opportunity to show T the "brick molding" that he is proposing to use around the garage windows. It is the current molding and not exactly the same as around the windows on the main house. T was completely satisfied with it.
Then we went down to our tile dealer and spoke with David, the owner. We took along the architectural drawings just in case he wanted to see the geometry of the sunroom flooring in order to determine the amount of tile we would need. Mike had provided us with the area estimate of the tile of 440 sq ft, but we knew we would need some extra. David had previously assured us that the Fitch Rainbow porcelain tile was still available. We had selected it in April of 2014, so it would not have surprised us if it had been discontinued (as was the stone we had previously selected for the chimney breast). Initially, David said he did not need to see the drawings. This changed as we described to him what was involved in the project and, by the time we were ready to depart, David not only wanted to see the drawings, he asked if we could leave them with him. He suggested he would bring them back to us over the weekend so that he could actually see what has been done so far. He also said he would call us back Friday evening with his recommendations on how much to order. He did not call, but he did send the proposal and we talked this morning. He is recommending 483 sq ft of tile and 12 feet of bullnose trim. David said he would place the order on Monday and it would probably take a couple of weeks for delivery. I suggested that we may ask him to hold the material until we need it, which may be a few weeks after delivery. David said he was planning to drop by Sunday afternoon to look at the project and drop off the drawings.
We also got a phone message from Michael at the Overhead Door dealership. He said he would call with our cost estimate. I tried to return the call, but he was not available. I will also call him on Monday. There is no rush on this order as Michael told us on Thursday that they will not be placing any new orders with the factor for two weeks.
Today, we were actually considering what decanter we want to put on the sunroom bar. This is the fun part of the project and it has taken a long time to get here. Here are the ones we are considering. We need to tell Bob (cabinetry) how deep to make the rail rack along the bar mirror. These decanters range from 3.5" to 4.25" wide.
If we assume 4" decanters and a rail split on ether side of the bar sink, I think we can fit 10 decanters across the bar.